Titi
Titi v. City of San Diego Municipality
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 Kathryn M. Titi, Case Nos. 12 22-CV-1561-DMS-KSC Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS City of San Diego Municipality, AND (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT Defendant. PREJUDICE
Plaintiff Kathryn M. Titi, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Complaint along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 25
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is…