Tamraz
Tamraz v. Bakotic Pathology Associates, L.L.C.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 AARON TAMRAZ, Case No. 22-cv-0725-BAS-WVG Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 10)
BAKOTIC PATHOLOGY
ASSOCIATES, LLC; BAKO
PATHOLOGY HOLDINGS
CORPORATION, Defendants.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) to dismiss this putative class action. (Mot., ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 11), and Defendant replies (Reply, ECF No. 12). The Court finds Defendants’ Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted, without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(i). Having considered the parties’ filings, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion and GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend.1
1 Defendants submitted requests for judicial notice of documents in support of the motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 10-2, 12-2.) The Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for judicial notice as to Exhibit B, a I. BACKGROUND Defendant Bakotic…