Rutledge
Rutledge v. ADP, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 NATHANAEL RUTLEDGE, Case No.: 22-cv-0898-L-BLM
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST, SECOND,
ADP, INC.,
FOURTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH
Defendant. CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) AND GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND
12 [ECF No. 10]
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff opposed the motion, (ECF No. 11), and Defendant replied, (ECF No. 15). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied and Plaintiff is granted leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND According to Plaintiff’s complaint, Nathanael Rutledge (“Plaintiff”) was an Assistant District Manager at ADP, Inc. (“Defendant”) from March of 2019 until he was terminated on August 27,…