Jenkins

Jenkins v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20223:21-cv-01653California3,582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ARTHUR JENKINS, Case No.: 21cv1653-GPC(AGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION DENYING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

R.C. JOHNSON, Warden,

CORPUS

Respondent. 16 Petitioner James Arthur Jenkins (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition”) on September 21, 2021. (Dkt. No. 1.) On January 19, 2022, Respondent filed an answer and notice of lodgment of state court records. (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7.) Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler filed a report and recommendation (“R&R”) denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus on August 30, 2022. (Dkt. No. 8.) No objections were filed. For the reasons discussed below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R and DENIES and DISMISSES the petition for writ of habeas corpus and also DENIES a certificate of appealability. Procedural Background On July 1, 2019, a jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.