Wolf

Smith v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20223:20-cv-01409California1,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

21 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion to Support Subject 22 Matter Jurisdiction, (ECF No. 22), Motion Providing Proof of Legal Name Change, (ECF 23 No. 23), and Motion for Order Extending Time to Serve, (ECF No. 24). Upon 24 consideration of the motions and the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, 25 the Court DENIES the Supplemental Motion to Support Jurisdiction, GRANTS the 26 request to proceed under Plaintiff’s legal name, and GRANTS the motion for extension of 27 time to serve Defendants. 28 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff G. Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding in forma pauperis, filed a Second Amended Complaint on April 22, 2021, alleging violations of Breach of Contract, Assault, Trespass, Trespass to Chattels, Conversion, Abuse of Process, Unjust Enrichment, Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Relations, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. (Second Amend. Compl., ECF No. 11). Plaintiff requested compensatory and punitive damages in the amount of $2.7…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.