Valles

Valles v. Attorney General of the United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20223:22-cv-01375California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW VALLES, Case No.: 22-CV-1375 TWR (MDD)

CDCR #BJ-6191,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL of the UNITED FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE 16 STATES; ATTORNEY GENERAL of the STATE of CALIFORNIA; and (ECF No. 2) ATTORNEY GENERAL of the STATE 18 of UTAH, Defendants. 20 On September 9, 2022, Plaintiff Andrew Valles, currently incarcerated at California Institution for Men in Chino, California, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1, “Compl.”) and a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff did not pay the $402 filing fee. (See ECF 1.) Plaintiff was convicted of four misdemeanor sex offenses in Utah in 2004 and was released from custody in 2006 but has since been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.