Chien

Chien v. Bumble Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20223:22-cv-00020California11,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RYAN CHIEN, individually and on behalf Case No.: 3:22-cv-00020-GPC-NLS of all others similarly situated,

JUDGMENT AND ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 12 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

BUMBLE INC., BUZZ HOLDINGS L.P.,

DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL and BUMBLE TRADING LLC,

JURISDICTION

15 Defendants. (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

18 [ECF No. 24]

20 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative to Compel Arbitration, 21 Plaintiff Ryan Chien’s First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Bumble Inc., Buzz 22 Holdings L.P., and Bumble Trading LLC (collectively referred to as “Bumble” except 23 where otherwise indicated). (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court 24 GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and 25 GRANTS Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration.

28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ryan Chien filed his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.