Rademaker

Rademaker v. Ganzekaufer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20223:21-cv-01757California1,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DAVID RADEMAKER, Case No.: 21-CV-1757 JLS (AHG)

CDCR #P-01361,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

Plaintiff, FOR RECONSIDERATION OF v. DENIAL OF MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

Dr. GANZEKAUFER, Ph.D, CDCR AND (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR Psychologist; COVELLO, Warden;

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

Q. JACKSON, Correctional Sergeant;

AMENDED COMPLAINT

P. GONZALEZ, Correctional Officer;

18 ZAMBRANO, Correctional Officer; and (ECF Nos. 18 & 19) STEADMAN, Associate Warden, Defendants. 21 Plaintiff David Rademaker, a state prisoner incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, is proceeding pro se with a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 12 (“FAC”). Plaintiff alleges an RJD psychologist, two RJD wardens, and three RJD correctional officers violated his First, Eighth, and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.