Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20223:22-cv-00594California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BELL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-0594-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S NXP USA, INC.,

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

Defendant. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT; and

(2) GRANTING JOINT MOTION

TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S

TIME TO RESPOND

19 [ECF No. 66]

21 Plaintiff seeks leave of Court to file an Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 15(a)(2). (ECF No. 66.) This is Plaintiff’s first such request. Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s Motion. Under Rule 15(a)(2), leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Ninth Circuit has held that, although the question whether to grant leave to amend pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) is left to the trial court’s discretion, the determination “should be guided by the underlying purpose of Rule 15(a) . . . which [is] to facilitate decisions on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.