Haeussinger
Haeussinger v. Gore
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN D. HAEUSSINGER, II, Case No.: 22-CV-186-RSH-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT
BILL GORE, et al.,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Defendants. [ECF No. 2] 16 17 18 This Order addresses Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP motion and, after screening the Complaint, DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP “Plaintiffs normally must pay $3501 to file a civil complaint in federal district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), but 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) allows the district court to waive the fee, 25
27 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants ordinarily must pay an 28 for most individuals unable to afford it, by granting IFP status.” Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). A court may authorize the commencement of a suit without prepayment of…