Martinez

Martinez v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20223:22-cv-01803California2,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS A. MARTINEZ, Case No.: 22-CV-1803 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND (2) DISMISSING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendant. COMPLAINT

16 (ECF Nos. 1 & 2) 17 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Carlos A. Martinez’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s Complaint, his IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint for the reasons that follow. IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of / / / / / / / /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.