Bonta

Miller v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20223:22-cv-01446California3,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAMES MILLER, et al., Case No.: 22cv1446-BEN (JLB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief from a newly-enacted California state law adding an attorney’s fees and costs shifting provision codified at California Code Civ. Procedure § 1021.11. Fee shifting provisions are not unusual in American law. But this one is.1 19 20 21 1 (a) Notwithstanding any other law, any person, including an entity, attorney, or law firm, who seeks declaratory or injunctive relief to prevent this state, a political subdivision, a governmental entity or public official in this state, or a person in this state from enforcing any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any other type of law that regulates or restricts firearms, or that represents any litigant seeking that relief, is jointly and severally liable to pay the attorney’s fees and costs of the prevailing 24 party. (b) For purposes of this section, a party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.