Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20223:21-cv-01249California4,251 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY Case No.: 21-cv-1249-WQH-AHG

INSURANCE COMPANY,

12

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 v. 14

THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO

15

SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION,

16 Defendant. 17

18

THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO

19 SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION, 20 Counter Claimant, 21 v. 22 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY,

23 Counter Defendant. 24 25 HAYES, Judge: 26 The matter before the Court is the Motion for Judgment on the Amended Pleadings 27 (ECF No. 57) filed by Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance 28 Company. 1 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 On July 9, 2021, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (“Ironshore”) filed a 3 Complaint for Declaratory Relief against The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master 4 Association (“The Crosby”), requesting a declaration pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment 5 Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, regarding The Crosby’s obligation to satisfy a $150,000 6 retention in connection with coverage for two underlying actions against The Crosby 7 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.