Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master Association
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRONSHORE SPECIALTY Case No.: 21-cv-1249-WQH-AHG
INSURANCE COMPANY,
ORDER
Plaintiff, 13 v.
THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO
SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION,
16 Defendant.
THE CROSBY ESTATE AT RANCHO
SANTA FE MASTER ASSOCIATION, Counter Claimant, v. IRONSHORE SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
23 Counter Defendant. 24 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion for Judgment on the Amended Pleadings (ECF No. 57) filed by Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 9, 2021, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (“Ironshore”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Relief against The Crosby Estate at Rancho Santa Fe Master Association (“The Crosby”), requesting a declaration pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202, regarding The Crosby’s obligation to satisfy a $150,000 retention in connection with coverage for two underlying actions against The Crosby 7 …