Gastelum

Gastelum v. Pinnacle Hotel Circle LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20223:21-cv-01458California5,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-CV-1458 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR

PINNACLE HOTEL CIRCLE LP, dba

JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND

Comfort Inn and Suites San Diego Zoo (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S SeaWorld Area,

MOTION TO DISMISS

16 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 15 & 15-2) 18 19 Presently before the Court are Defendant Pinnacle Hotel Circle LP’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (“Mot.,” ECF No. 15) and Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN,” ECF No. 15-2). Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 16), and Defendant filed a Reply in support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 17). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 17. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.