Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20223:22-cv-00255California1,781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HEARN, CDCR #AS-7111, Case No.: 22-cv-255-TWR-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

RJD WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants. [Dkt. No. 27] 16 Plaintiff William Hearn (“Plaintiff”), an inmate currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Recruitment or Appointment of Pro Bono Publico [Counsel] (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 27. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his complaint on February 24, 2022, alleging that Defendants violated his rights under the First and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. See generally Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.