Sussman

Sussman v. San Diego Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20223:20-cv-01085California1,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 NANCY SUSSMAN, MICHAEL Case No.: 20cv1085-JO-MDD

SUSSMAN ESTATE THEREOF BY

AND THRU HIS SPECIAL

ADMINISTER FOR THE ESTATE,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff,

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

12 v.

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

14 et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Nancy Sussman originally filed a lawsuit alleging that various judges, attorneys, government entities, and private parties conspired to harm her and her son and violate their civil rights. On March 29, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (the “SAC”) in full and granted her leave to amend certain claims. Dkt. 139. On May 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed a third amended complaint (the “TAC”) alleging only the following two claims: (1) abuse of process against Assistant District Attorney Wendy Patrick (“ADA Patrick”); and (2) violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against her prior insurer, Allstate …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.