Sussman

Sussman v. San Diego Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20223:20-cv-01085California498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 NANCY SUSSMAN, MICHAEL Case No.: 20cv1085-JO-MDD

SUSSMAN ESTATE THEREOF BY

AND THRU HIS SPECIAL

ADMINISTER FOR THE ESTATE,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff,

MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE

JUDGMENT v.

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

14 et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On April 12, 2022, pro se Plaintiff Nancy Sussman filed what appears to be a motion to set aside a judgment issued by the Honorable Judge Dana Sabraw in a separate action. See Dkt. 140. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motion. A. Prior Action Filed by Plaintiff On June 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed suit alleging a conspiracy to falsely prosecute and convict her son, Mr. Sussman. Nancy Sussman, et al. v. San Diego Police Dept., et al., Case No. 19cv1063 DMS (JLB) (the “Prior Action”). Judge Sabraw, who presided over the Prior Action, dismissed Plaintiff’s second amended complaint with prejudice on November 4, 2019. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.