Perreira

Perreira v. Dewoody

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20223:22-cv-01846California1,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC PERREIRA, Case No.: 22-CV-1846-CAB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

A. DEWOODY, ADDISON REEVES and

DISMISSING COMPLAINT

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

15 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 1, 2]

17 On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff Eric Perreira filed a complaint against 18 Defendants A. Dewoody, Allison Reeves, and the San Diego Police Department. [Doc. 19 No. 1]. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the 20 time of filing; instead, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2]. For the reasons mentioned below, the IFP is 22 GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

I. Motion to Proceed IFP

25 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See 26 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5(a). However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the court may 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.