Sundberg

Sundberg v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20223:22-cv-01897California1,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY FRITHIOF SUNDBERG, Case No.: 3:22-cv-1897-CAB-BLM

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND (2)

PATTON STATE HOSPITAL, et al.,

DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT

Respondents. PREJUDICE 16 Petitioner, a proceeding pro se and currently in the custody of Patton State Hospital,1 has submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1 & 2. REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS According to Petitioner’s trust account statement, he has insufficient on account at the California institution in which he is presently confined to pay the $5.00 filing fee. See ECF No. 2 at 4. Thus, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and allows Petitioner to prosecute the above-referenced action without being

26 1 Based on a previous petition filed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.