Hernandez

Hernandez v. Newsom

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20223:22-cv-01143California755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 22-CV-1143-RSH-JLB

CDCR #BG-2900,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO SEND PLAINTIFF COPIES OF

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., COMPLAINT AND FIRST Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND

(2) EXTENDING TIME TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

19 On August 1, 2022, Plaintiff Julian Carlos Hernandez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel. ECF Nos. 1–2, 4. On August 29, 2022, the Court denied those motions without prejudice and dismissed the Complaint with leave to amend.1 ECF No. 5. Plaintiff subsequently filed a

26 In response to Plaintiff’s question regarding the definition of “leave to amend,” ECF No. 11 at 3, the Court clarifies that when Plaintiff was granted leave to amend, that meant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.