Fierro

Fierro v. Capital One, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20223:22-cv-00493California3,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 PATRICIA FIERRO, Case No. 22-cv-00493-BAS-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 12)

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,

Defendant. 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Patricia Fierro’s Motion to Remand this action to state court. (Mot. to Remand, ECF No. 12.) Defendant Capital One, N.A. invoked federal diversity jurisdiction to remove the case to federal court. (Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff argues that this case fails to meet the amount in controversy to satisfy diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Mot. 3:10–12.) Defendant opposes the motion (Opp’n, ECF No. 16) and Plaintiff replies (Reply, ECF No. 18). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court finds removal was appropriate and DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.