Apodaca

Apodaca v. Weimer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20223:21-cv-01402California2,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. APODACA, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01402-RBM-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

DEPUTY BRYAN WEIMER;

IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPT.,

16 Defendants. [Doc. 9] 18 On March 2, 2022, Defendants Bryan Weimer (“Defendant Weimer”) and Imperial County Sheriff’s Office (collectively, the “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff Mark A. Apodaca (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition on March 7, 2022. (Doc. 11.) Defendants filed a reply on April 8, 2022. (Doc. 12.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his initial complaint against Defendants on August 4, 2021 (“Original Complaint”). (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that on November 18, 2015, he was at his mother’s house and heard loud…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.