Whyte

Whyte v. City of San Diego

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20223:21-cv-01159California4,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WHYTE, an individual; Case No. 21cv1159-LAB-MDD DORION JACKETT, an individual; KANIUS HILL, an individual, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [Dkt. 16] v. 15 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipality; SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER (badge # unknown), an individual; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

On May 26, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Michael Whyte, Dorion Jackett, and Kanius Hill’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for failure to state claims of liability under Monell v. Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978), against Defendants City of San Diego (the “City”) and San Diego Police Department Officer Trevor Sterling (“Officer Sterling”) (collectively, “Defendants”). The Court found that Plaintiffs’ allegations of civil rights violations related to a June 2, 2020 traffic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.