Crlollos

(PC) Reynolds v. Crlollos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20223:22-cv-01830California1,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRONE REYNOLDS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01830-JAH-BGS

CDCR #2977,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

R. CRLOLLOS, et al.,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR Defendants. FAILING TO PREPAY FILING

FEES REQUIRED BY

28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

18 [ECF No. 2] 19 Plaintiff Tyrone Reynolds, while housed at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Eastern District of California. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Reynolds has not prepaid the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), but instead has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). On November 21, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Sheila Oberto determined that the claims giving rise to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.