Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20223:20-cv-00959California3,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00959-RBM-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S OTTAWA UNIVERSITY,

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PENDING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (Doc. 49);

(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PENDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING (Doc. 22 49); and 23 (3) REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIFING

25 [Doc. 49]

27 On January 25, 2021, Defendant Ottawa University (“Defendant” or “OU”) filed a 28 motion to dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss”) and motion to strike (“Motion to Strike”) Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 48) (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(f) (“Motion”). (Doc. 49.) Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota (“Plaintiff” or “Vashisht-Rota”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.