Frengel
Frengel v. McLaren Automotive, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH THOMAS FRENGEL and Case No.: 3:22-cv-0664 W (RBB)
RALPH FRENGEL,
12 ORDER GRANTING O’GARA’s Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. 24] v. AND MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC.
MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al. 25] Defendants.
17 Defendant O’Gara Coach Company, LLC dba McClaren Beverly Hills (“O’Gara”) 18 and McLaren Automotive Inc. (“McLaren”) separately move to dismiss the Second 19 Amended Complaint (“SAC”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)1 and 9(b). 20 Plaintiffs Ralph Thomas Frengel and Ralph Frengel oppose. 21 The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. 22 See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS O’Gara’s 23 Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 24] in its entirety WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND and 24 GRANTS McLaren Automotive, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] WITH LEAVE 25 26 27 28 TO AMEND the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and…