Doe
Strike 3 Holding, LLC v. Doe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01823-RSH-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
v. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
SERVE A THIRD-PARTY
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP
SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE
address 76.167.182.25, 26(f) CONFERENCE Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 4] 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Strike Holdings, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. ECF No. 4. Here, Plaintiff has failed to properly identify the entity it is seeking to subpoena. Plaintiff asked the Court for leave to issue a subpoena addressed to “Spectrum” but does not specifically identify which “Spectrum.” See Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, No. 22cv1626-RSH-MDD, 2022 WL 17363889, at *1–2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022) (denying identical motion because “Plaintiff provides no further information about Spectrum, which does not…