Hearn
Hearn v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HEARN, CDCR Case No.: 22-cv-255-TWR-DDL #AS-7111,
REPORT AND
Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION FOR v. ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
RJD WARDEN et al., DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants.
[Dkt. No. 15]
Plaintiff William Hearn (“Plaintiff”), an inmate at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated rights afforded to him by the First and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. See generally Dkt. Nos. 1, 26. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) by Defendants E. Frijas (“Frijas”) and M. Pollard (“Pollard,” and, with Frijas, “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 15. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”). Dkt. No. 27 …