Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20223:22-cv-00255California1,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HEARN, CDCR Case No.: 22-cv-255-TWR-DDL #AS-7111,

REPORT AND

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATION FOR v. ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

RJD WARDEN et al., DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants.

[Dkt. No. 15]

Plaintiff William Hearn (“Plaintiff”), an inmate at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated rights afforded to him by the First and Eighth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. See generally Dkt. Nos. 1, 26. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Motion to Dismiss”) by Defendants E. Frijas (“Frijas”) and M. Pollard (“Pollard,” and, with Frijas, “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 15. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”). Dkt. No. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.