Chaudry

Chaudry v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20223:21-cv-01847California2,855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A. WAHEED CHAUDRY, Case No.: 21cv1847-GPC(AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO ALTER, AMEND OR

VACATE JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; TODD

MCCRACKEN; LUZETTE WARNER;

[Dkt. No. 31.]

ELIZABETH MILLER; ALEJANDRO

CHAVIRA, AND Does 1 through 25, Defendant. 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to alter, amend, or vacate judgment entered on September 21, 2022 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 59(e) and Rule 60. (Dkt. No. 31.) Defendants Todd McCracken and Luzette Werner (“Assessor Defendants”) filed an opposition. (Dkt. No. 34.) Defendants County of San Diego, Alejandro Chavira and Elizabeth Miller filed a notice of joinder with Assessor Defendants’ opposition. (Dkt. No. 35.) After the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, on November 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 38.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.