Bryson

Bryson v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20223:22-cv-00556California1,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD BRYSON, Case No.: 22cv556-BAS(LR)

Petitioner,

NOTICE REGARDING POSSIBLE

v. DISMISSAL OF PETITION FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

RAYMOND MADDEN, et al.,

COURT REMEDIES

Respondents. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On April 20, 2022, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a Motion for Stay, a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, and a Motion for Discovery. (ECF Nos. 1–4.) The Court dismissed this case without prejudice on May 12, 2022, because Petitioner had failed to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or move to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Petitioner was given until July 18, 2022, to pay the fee or file an IFP motion together with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. (ECF No. 5.) On July 11, 2022, Petitioner filed an IFP motion, but did not provide the Court with 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.