Orozco

Orozco v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20223:22-cv-01732California3,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO OROZCO, Case No.: 22cv1732-RBM (DDL)

CDCR #BI-6982,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

C. MADDEN, Warden, et al.,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) 16 17 Plaintiff Ricardo Orozco, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a failure to prepay the

26 In addition to a $350 fee, civil litigants, other than those granted leave to proceed IFP, must pay an additional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.