Fiaseu

Fiaseu v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20223:22-cv-00752California3,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PASE FIASEU and RODOLFO Case No.: 3:22-cv-00752-GPC-BLM

MARTINEZ,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, DISMISS v. 13 [ECF No. 5]

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

14 Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Pase Fiaseu’s and Rodolfo Martinez’s operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC” or “Complaint”), filed by Defendant United States of America. (ECF 5.) Mr. Fiaseu and Mr. Martinez have filed their response in opposition to the motion to dismiss, (ECF 9), and the United States has replied, (ECF 11). The Court held oral arguments on November 18, 2022. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the United States’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Pase Fiaseu and Rodolfo Martinez are seeking damages, costs, and attorney’s fees against Defendant United States for events taking place between October 2020 and May 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.