Zeller

Zeller v. Optavia, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:22-cv-00434California2,826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JAMIE ZELLER, and ANGELICA Case No.: 22-cv-434-DMS-MSB

ALPERT,

11 Individually, and on Behalf of All Others ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT Similarly Situated, MEDIFAST, INC.’S AMENDED

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

OPTAVIA, LLC and MEDIFAST, INC.,

Defendants.

This case comes before the Court on Defendant Medifast, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Medifast”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Jamie Zeller’s and Angelica Alpert’s (“Plaintiffs”) claims for violation of a number of California consumer protection laws and related common law claims. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) on grounds that Plaintiffs lack personal jurisdiction over Medifast. The motion is fully briefed and submitted. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.