Zimmer

Thunderbird Resorts Inc. v. Zimmer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20223:15-cv-01304California3,096 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THUNDERBIRD RESORTS INC., a Case No.: 3:15-cv-01304-JAH-BGS British Isles corporation, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 124) MURRAY JO ZIMMER, an individual;

ANGULAR INVESTMENTS

CORPORATION, a Panama corporation; MITZIM PROPERTIES, INC., a Nevada 14 corporation; and TALOMA ZULU, S.A., a Panamanian corporation; JACK RAY MITCHELL, an individual, 16 Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Jack Ray Mitchell and Mitzim Properties’ (collectively, “Moving Defendants”) motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Plaintiff Thunderbird Resorts Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Thunderbird”). Having taken into consideration the parties’ submissions, the Court DENIES Moving Defendants’ motion to dismiss. II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint for damages against Murray Jo Zimmer (“Zimmer”), Angular Investments Corporation (“Angular”), Mitzim 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.