Allen

Allen v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20223:20-cv-01389California1,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALLEN, Case No.: 20-CV-1389 JLS (LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO FILE THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND (2) DENYING AS

DIAZ, et al.,

MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 55, 60)

Presently before the Court are Defendant Theresa Currier’s (“Defendant” or “Dr. Currier”) Motion to Dismiss (“MTD,” ECF No. 55) and Plaintiff Michael Allen’s (“Plaintiff” or “Allen”) Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Amend,” ECF No. 60). Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opposition to (ECF No. 58) and Defendant’s Reply in support of (ECF No. 59) the MTD, and Defendant’s Opposition to (“Am. Opp’n,” ECF No. 62) and Plaintiff’s Replies in support of (“1st Am. Reply,” ECF No. 63; “2d Am. Reply,” ECF No. 64) the Motion to Amend. Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and DENIES AS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.