Webster

Webster v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20223:14-cv-00994California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 14cv0994 DMS(NLS)

SAMUEL A. WEBSTER III,

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. REOPEN CASE DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, et al., Respondents. 15 16 On March 23, 2016, this Court issued an order denying Petitioner’s First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner filed an appeal of that decision, which was denied on November 22, 2016. On May 2, 2022, Petitioner filed the present motion to reopen his case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). Rule 60(b) provides that a court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.