Raya

Raya v. Barka

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20223:19-cv-02295California4,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT RAYA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2295-WQH-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S DAVID BARKA, et al., MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, and

Defendants. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF HIS

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

19 [ECF No. 129] 20 21 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions. ECF No. 129. Plaintiff seeks an order from the Court sanctioning Defendants and their counsel for interfering with third- party subpoenas and for making false statements in a discovery motion, which Defendants oppose. Id.; ECF No. 133. In addition to monetary sanctions for attorney fees, Plaintiff also requests that the Court reconsider his motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 29), which the Court had denied without prejudice (ECF No. 32). ECF No. 129-1 at 11, 15. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.