Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20223:22-cv-00676California724 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; and Case No.: 22-cv-00676-H-MSB
WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ORDER:
13 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 14 v. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED SHORELINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.; and
COMPLAINT; AND
DAN S. KAUFMAN,
Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 103, 105.]
18 (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT SHORELINE’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN
AMENDED ANSWER AND
COUNTERCLAIMS
22 [Doc. No. 88.] 23 On November 25, 2022, Defendant Shoreline Biosciences, Inc. (“Shoreline”) filed a 24 motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaims. (Doc. No. 88.) On 25 December 27, 2022, Plaintiffs Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (“Fate”) and Whitehead Institute of 26 Biomedical Research (“Whitehead”) filed an unopposed motion for leave to file a first 27 amended complaint. (Doc. No. 103.) In their motion for…