Pritchard

Pritchard v. SharkNinja Operating, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20223:22-cv-00316California1,844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL PRITCHARD, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00316-AJB-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT

MOTION TO AMEND

v.

SCHEDULING ORDER, SUA

SHARKNINJA OPERATING, LLC, SPONTE EXTENDING REMAINING

DATES IN THE CASE SCHEDULE,

Defendant.

AND ISSUING SECOND AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 17]

19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 17. The parties request that the Court extend certain deadlines in the case schedule by approximately three weeks. Id. at 2. However, they ask that all remaining pretrial dates in the case schedule following the pretrial motions filing deadline remain in place as previously set in the Court’s operative First Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 14). Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” “Good cause”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.