Block Scientific, Inc. v. True Diagnostics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:21-cv-01118California3,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLOCK SCIENTIFIC, INC., Case No.: 3:21-cv-01118-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

TRUE DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,

COMPLAINT

SYNTRON BIORESEARCH, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. 22] 16 17 On April 1, 2022, Syntron Bioresearch, Inc. (“Syntron”) and True Diagnostics, Inc. (“True Diagnostics”) (collectively the “Suppliers” or “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss portions of the first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiff Block Scientific, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (Doc. 22 (“MTD”).) Plaintiff filed its opposition to the MTD on April 28, 2022. (Doc. 25 (“Opp.”).) Defendants filed a response in support of their MTD on May 5, 2022. (Doc. 28 (“Reply”).) The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (Doc. 24.) For the reasons discussed below, the MTD is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.