Fate Therapeutics, Inc. v. Shoreline Biosciences, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20233:22-cv-00676California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; and Case No.: 22-cv-00676-H-MSB

WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, ORDER:

13 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 14 v. MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; AND SHORELINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.; and

DAN S. KAUFMAN, [Doc. Nos. 75, 109.] Defendants. (2) DIRECTING THE CLERK TO

FILE THE PROPOSED

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

20 [Doc. Nos. 39, 110.] 21 On July 7, 2022, Defendant Dan S. Kaufman filed an answer and counterclaims. 22 (Doc. No. 39.) On October 25, 2022, Plaintiffs Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (“Fate”) and 23 Whitehead Institute of Biomedical Research (“Whitehead”) filed a motion to seal portions 24 of Defendant Kaufman’s answer and counterclaims pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79.2 and 25 Patent Local Rule 2.2. (Doc. No. 75.) Defendant Kaufman does not oppose Plaintiffs’ 26 October 25, 2022 motion to seal. (See Doc. No. 75-1, Scaccia Decl. ¶ 6.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.