Dunsmore
Dunsmore v. State of California
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:20-cv-00406California1,529 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, ERNEST Case No.: 20-cv-00406-AJB-DDL
ARCHULETA, ANTHONY
EDWARDS, REANNA LEVY, JOSUE ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
LOPEZ, CHRISTOPHER NELSON,
CHRISTOPHER NORWOOD, and INTERVENE LAURA ZOERNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly (Doc. No. 183) situated, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, CORRECTIONAL
HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, INC.,
TRI-CITY MEDICAL CENTER,
LIBERTY HEALTHCARE, INC.,
MID-AMERICA HEALTH, INC.,
LOGAN HAAK, M.D., INC., SAN
DIEGO COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, Defendants. 24 Presently pending before the Court is non-party Pedro Rodriguez’s motion to 25 intervene as a plaintiff in this action. (Doc. No. 183.) For the reasons set forth below, the 26 Court DENIES the motion. 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND The Court has previously recited the factual background in this case at length and will not reiterate it here. (See, e.g.,…