Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:20-cv-00406California1,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, ERNEST Case No.: 20-cv-00406-AJB-DDL

ARCHULETA, ANTHONY

EDWARDS, REANNA LEVY, JOSUE ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

LOPEZ, CHRISTOPHER NELSON,

CHRISTOPHER NORWOOD, and INTERVENE LAURA ZOERNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly (Doc. No. 183) situated, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO, CORRECTIONAL

HEALTHCARE PARTNERS, INC.,

TRI-CITY MEDICAL CENTER,

LIBERTY HEALTHCARE, INC.,

MID-AMERICA HEALTH, INC.,

LOGAN HAAK, M.D., INC., SAN

DIEGO COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, Defendants. 24 Presently pending before the Court is non-party Pedro Rodriguez’s motion to 25 intervene as a plaintiff in this action. (Doc. No. 183.) For the reasons set forth below, the 26 Court DENIES the motion. 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND The Court has previously recited the factual background in this case at length and will not reiterate it here. (See, e.g.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.