Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20233:20-cv-00967California5,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00967-RBM-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY,

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

Defendant. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

16 COMPLAINT (Doc. 63); and 17 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Doc. 64)

[Docs. 63, 64]

22 On March 17, 2021, Defendant Harrisburg University (“Defendant” or 23 “Harrisburg”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Docs. 49, 24 62) (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”), 25 along with a request for judicial notice (“RJN”) regarding Department of Fair Employment 26 and Housing (“DFEH”) right-to-sue letters and related correspondence. (Docs. 63-64.) 27 Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota (“Plaintiff” or “Vashisht-Rota”), appearing pro se, filed an 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.