Ali

Ali v. Franklin Wireless Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20233:21-cv-00687California3,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMMED USMAN ALI, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00687-AJB-MSB individually and on behalf of all others 12 similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, CLASS CERTIFICATION

v. (Doc. No. 41)

FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP., OC

KIM, and DAVID BROWN,

18 Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Lead Plaintiff Gergely Csaba’s (“Lead Plaintiff”) Motion for Class Certification. (Doc. No. 41.) Defendants Franklin Wireless Corporation (“Franklin” or the “Company”), O.C. Kim, and David Brown (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition, to which Lead Plaintiff replied. (Doc. Nos. 47, 48.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On April 16, 2021, Mohammed Usman Ali filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendants for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). On September 15, 2021, the Court appointed Gergely Csaba as Lead Plaintiff …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.