Roberts

Roberts v. Olson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20233:22-cv-01373California1,773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 22-CV-1373 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING WITH

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

CALI OLSON; MATT MILLES; U.S. BANK; and MAGLONA, 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 10) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC,” ECF No. 10). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s TAC and the applicable law, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint for the reasons that follow. 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 9) on November 28, 2022. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) provides that a party may amend their complaint once as of right within twenty- one days of serving the complaint or twenty-one days after service of a responsive pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Plaintiff, however, is proceeding pro se and the SAC must first be screened before service may occur. Accordingly, because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.