Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCRIPPS HEALTH, Case No.: 21-CV-1634-AJB(WVG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
EX PARTE MOTION FOR
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY,
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Defendant. [ECF No. 47] 16 17 On December 29, 2022, Plaintiff Scripps Health (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte Motion for Protective Order (“Ex Parte Motion”). (ECF No. 47.) The Ex Parte Motion seeks an order from the Court requiring (1) the depositions of Plaintiff’s personnel be conducted remotely or, in the alternative, requiring that all attendees of any in-person deposition wear protective masks; and (2) precluding Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company (“Defendant”) from taking more than 15 depositions. Id. Pursuant to Judge Gallo’s Civil Chamber Rule VI, Defendant had until 5:00 p.m. on December 30, 2022 to file an opposition brief. Since Defendant did not file an opposition brief, the Court…