Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20223:21-cv-01634California1,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCRIPPS HEALTH, Case No.: 21-CV-1634-AJB(WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

EX PARTE MOTION FOR

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY,

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendant. [ECF No. 47] 16 17 On December 29, 2022, Plaintiff Scripps Health (“Plaintiff”) filed an Ex Parte Motion for Protective Order (“Ex Parte Motion”). (ECF No. 47.) The Ex Parte Motion seeks an order from the Court requiring (1) the depositions of Plaintiff’s personnel be conducted remotely or, in the alternative, requiring that all attendees of any in-person deposition wear protective masks; and (2) precluding Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company (“Defendant”) from taking more than 15 depositions. Id. Pursuant to Judge Gallo’s Civil Chamber Rule VI, Defendant had until 5:00 p.m. on December 30, 2022 to file an opposition brief. Since Defendant did not file an opposition brief, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.