Strojnik

Strojnik v. Carte Hotel Ventures, LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20233:22-cv-01088California443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK, Case No.: 22-CV-1088 TWR (AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING FILING FEE

v. OR APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, through Rob

Bonta in his official capacity as the 15 Attorney General of the State of California; and CARTÉ HOTEL

VENTURES, LP,

17 Defendants. 18

Plaintiff Peter Strojnik, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint in July 2022 and a First Amended Complaint in September 2022. (See generally ECF Nos. 1, 4.) Neither Complaint was accompanied by a filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay filing and administration fees totaling $402. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). A court may, however, in its

27 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.