Baird

Baird v. Leidos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20223:22-cv-00060California3,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN BAIRD, Case No.: 22cv0060-LL(RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT

LEIDOS, INC., et al.,

LEIDOS, INC. TO PROVIDE

Defendants. FURTHER DISCOVERY

RESPONSES [ECF NO. 23]

16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Steven Baird’s Motion to Compel Defendant Leidos, Inc. (“Leidos”) to Provide Further Discovery Responses, in which Plaintiff requested an order compelling Defendant to provide further responses to Interrogatory Nos. 7(b) and 8-13, and Request for Production Nos. 20-22, 47, 49, and 54 [ECF No. 23]. Leidos filed an opposition [ECF No. 26], and Baird filed a reply [ECF No. 27]. On November 28, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief to apprise the Court of which discovery requests, if any, remained at issue following Defendant's production of documents on or around the deadline of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.