Martell

Martell v. San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs Cole (0473)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20233:22-cv-00920California5,419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD MARTELL, Case No.: 22-CV-920 JLS (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPUTY

JUDICIAL NOTICE; (2) GRANTING

SHERIFFS COLE (#0473); NAPUTI

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO (#3018); JOHNSON (#0497); LOVEJOY

DISMISS; AND (3) DISMISSING

(#3215); LANNON (#0233); YOUNG

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

(#0188); and DOES 1 through 5, 17 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 7, 7-2) 18 19 20 21 Presently before the Court are Defendants San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs Cole, Naputi, Johnson, Lovejoy, Lannon, and Young’s Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 7) and Request for Judicial Notice in Support of the same (“RJN,” ECF No. 7-2). Plaintiff Ronald Martell filed a Response in Opposition (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 14) and Defendants filed a Reply in Support (“Reply,” ECF No. 15) thereof. The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.