Frazier

Richardson v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20233:22-cv-01447California1,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN RICHARDSON, Case No.: 22-CV-1447 TWR (AHG)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

v. AMENDED PETITION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

FRAZIER, Warden,

Respondent. (ECF Nos. 5, 6)

On September 22, 2022, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1). On September 28, 2022, the Court issued an Order dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. (See generally ECF No. 2.) The Court gave Petitioner until November 10, 2022, either to pay the filing fee or to provide adequate proof of his inability to pay. (See id. at 1–2.) On October 14, 2022, Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee. (See generally ECF No. 3.) On October 25, 2022, the Court screened the Petition and dismissed it for failure to state a cognizable claim. (See generally ECF No. 4.) Petitioner was given…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.